Nose counting

James Fallows at the Atlantic points out a disturbing trend in journalism – referring to 60 as the number of votes to pass something in the Senate as opposed to 50. While it seems a bit petty, the filibuster has become so routine that news outlets frequently fail to even mention it when a bill is held up based on the filibuster:

via the Atlantic

You would assume from the headline above that 56 voted against and 42 voted for the bill – when in fact, the bill got 56 “Yay”‘s and was only defeated because of a Democratic filibuster. The headline above obscures the fact that the Bill could actually pass the Senate, if not for a few Democrat hold-outs and the use of the filibuster. I’ve not been a fan of the now-routine use of the filibuster on the Senate floor, particularly as it pertains to the appointment of nominees. The press needs to report these things accurately, even though doing so would take a few more words.

Advertisements

About thinklikeafox

I'm a Naval Officer living in Southern California. I hope to be attending law school in the next year or two, and I started writing this blog out of a desire to improve my writing and critical thinking skills after a couple years outside of academia.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s